|
Nhan Dan – At a recent national
conference, the education and training service discussed the
shortcomings and weaknesses of Vietnamese higher education and
ways for its development in the future.

Universities should develop standards for their lecturers
and graduates, thus helping them improve the quality of
their training.
Why have Vietnamese
universities yet to be in the top regional universities?
Despite having made efforts over
the past few years, the quality of Vietnamese higher education
remains low with no universities named in the regional or
global rankings. In the latest world university ranking
compiled by the Shanghai Jiao Tong (Transport) University’s
Institute of Higher Education for more than 2,000 universities
worldwide in 2007 based on their study and research, no
Vietnamese universities could be found in the top 500
universities in the world and top 100 universities in the
Asia-Pacific region.
The Researcher/ Higher Education
Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan also evaluated
and ranked the scientific paper performances of the top 500
universities worldwide. The performance measures were composed
of nine indicators to assess a university’s overall scientific
paper performance based on three criteria: research
productivity (accounts for 20%), research impact (30%), and
research excellence (50%). And no Vietnamese universities were
named in the council’s rankings in 2007.
In the Webometrics Rankings in
February, 2007, Vietnam had seven universities in the top 100
universities in Southeast Asia and Vietnam ranked only above
Laos and Cambodia.
In Vietnam, it was the first time
the evaluation of the quality of universities has been
included in legal documents of the Ministry of Education and
Training in December 2004. In 2005, 20 universities selected
from State-run and private-owned universities in the north,
south and Central Vietnam which were evaluated on a pilot
basis. By June 2007, the evaluation results show that no
universities reached level 3 (all-round evaluation), 16
universities reached level 2 (meeting between 80 and 91% of
criteria) and four universities reached level 1 (meeting
between 69 and 76% of criteria).
After two years of piloting the
evaluation of local universities, the Ministry of Education
and Training said that even though the evaluated universities
were top ones in Vietnam, they would have to overcome many
difficulties to catch up with universities regionally and
globally.
The quality of Vietnamese higher
education remains poor due to a lack of clear standards.
Concretely, Vietnam lacks concrete regulations on knowledge
and skills for each level of training as well as standards for
lecturers.
It was difficult to evaluate the
quality in the initial stage as Vietnam did not have enough
experienced experts in that field.
Furthermore, there was no
mechanism that encouraged Vietnamese and foreign experts to
join the evaluation.
In addition, Vietnam lacks
independent evaluating agencies.
At the same time, research
activities in universities have yet to be focused on. Research
works and studies are theoretical and their results have yet
to be applied.
Another reason is a shortage of
leading researchers and qualified managers, not to mention
other shortcomings and difficulties in finance and research
facilities.
Vietnam will have
universities in top 500
At a the national conference,
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Education and Training
Nguyen Thien Nhan said that as Vietnam lacked the necessary
mechanisms and has yet to consider quality as the highest
target in management. According to Mr Nhan, a change for the
better would only be seen in universities if State investment
went along with the quality of education and training.
Specially, universities should
develop standards for their lecturers and graduates, thus
helping them improve the quality of their training. The
Ministry of Education and Training has set a target that by
2018, Vietnamese universities will have to announce their
output standards. Lecturers will be evaluated at the end of
each academic year and students can give their evaluation on
lecturers.
In addition, directors of
universities should be given with the right to decide wages of
each lecturer based on their capability. Universities should
have enough facilities, especially Internet connection and
online libraries to help students access information.
It is necessary to identify where
universities stand now. The education and training service
should have a long-term vision and strategy.
It can be seen a good sign that
the service has set a target of having a university in the top
200 in the world and several universities in the top 500.
Professor and Dr Banh Tien Long,
deputy minister of education and training, said that to
improve the quality of higher education, right in 2008, the
Ministry of Education and Training will develop concrete
standard in the selection and recruitment of lecturers.
At the same time, the evaluation
and ranking of universities will be piloted based on quality
criteria. Universities will be responsible for taking part in
the evaluation.
Notably, the Ministry of Education
and Training plans to build research universities and will
strive to have 20 universities of the kind in 2020.
Additionally, the two
newly-established universities, the Vietnam-Germany University
and the Hanoi University of Technology will be organised as
internationally-standardised universities.
In 2008, a programme on training
of 20,000 doctorate holders will begin. In early months of
this year, the State sent 500 people abroad to study for their
doctorates. Vietnam hopes to have improved the quality of its
lecturers and managers by 2020, with 30% of lecturers in
universities and 15% in colleges holding a doctorate.
Some other tasks, which have been
discussed by the education and training service, are as
follow: to perfect the higher education system and network, to
renew training method and content, to promote investment in
training and learning facilities, to evaluate and rank
universities.
These are necessary for the
development of Vietnamese higher education, meeting the
requirement for human resource development when the country is
accelerating its industrialisation and modernisation and
international integration.
Phan Huy Hien
|
Twenty seven out of 284 universities have
an area of less than a hectare each, accounting for 9.51%.
The universities train around 57,000 students. This means
that each student in the university has only 2.67 square
metres.
The five smallest universities include the
Ho Chi Minh City University of Foreign
Languages-Information Technology (0.30 hectares); Ton Duc
Thang University (0.35 hectares); Ho Chi Minh City
Conservatoire (0.30 hectares); Hanoi Open University (0.37
hectares); Hung Vuong (0.40 hectares). The average area
for each student in each of the five universities is 0.6
square metres.
The five smallest colleges include Ho Chi
Minh City College of Economics and Technology (1.15
hectares); Radio and Television Broadcasting College 2
(0.25 hectares); Hanoi Arts College (0.30 hectares); Dong
Du College for Economics and Technology in Da Nang (0.30
hectares) and the Ho Chi Minh City College of Information
Technology (0.32 hectares). The average area for each
student in each of the five colleges is 1.4 square metres.
Source:
Ministry of Education and Training
|
|
The fact shows that many universities have
not cared about training targets. Students who are
enrolled into the universities do not know about training
targets. Enterprises do not know about training targets of
each university, either. It is worse when lecturers in the
universities do not know about the targets.
Associate
Professor and Dr Thai Ba Can
Director of the Ho Chi Minh City Technical Teacher
Training University |
|
A minimal criteria for the establishment of
a university was issued long time ago (despite bing much
lower than the global standard), why do many universities
have an average area of 0.6 square metres per student?
Why have many universities been established
despite a lack of facilities and lecturers? The shortage
of lecturers in a context of a sharp increase in the
number of students resulted in more extra work for
lecturers and extra incomes. As a result, lecturers are
not interested in research work and the high quality of
training has yet to be met.
Tran
Thuong Tuan
(University of Can Tho) |
|