|
The lessons learnt from and experience taken stock in the
struggle against the French colonialists helped Vietnam’s
military art to develop to a new height. It is the military
art of using small and high quality units to fight against
large and well-equipped invasion forces.
During 21 years of the anti-US war for national salvation from
1954 to 1975, the Vietnamese people had to experience
innumerable fierce challenges including significant losses and
sacrifices so as to seize independence and freedom. In over
two decades, the US aggressors used various ruthless methods
and measures to force the Vietnamese people to knuckle down.
The US administration then expected that their huge economic
and political potential and strength would lead to an easy and
rapid victory in Vietnam.
However, their subjective
intention did not come true. Vietnamese armed forces and
people, under the leadership of the Communist Party and
President Ho Chi Minh, launched a legendary struggle,
defeating nearly the nearly 1.5 million enemy troops and
smashed the US aggression scheme. In the anti-US war,
Vietnam’s military art was promoted to a new height thanks to
the lessons and experience drawn from the struggle against the
French colonialists. Our forces used small and flexible units
to fight against the enemy rich in quantity and weapons and
made full use of all opportunities to push the enemy into
passive situation.
An important evidence of
Vietnam’s excellent military art was the successful
implementation of the people's war in the, land, air, river
and sea battles.
By expanding people’s patriotic
spirit and creativity, the strategy of people’s war became
more and more perfect and strengthened in the mountainous,
rural, delta and urban regions. Revolutionary bases including
political and armed units were set up in both liberated and
invaded areas to serve as strong rears for the liberation of
the south.
In addition, the Truong Son
strategic transport line was continuously lengthened to the
south, linking the northern rear with the battlefields in the
south, to southern Lao, northeastern Cambodia, southern
Central Highlands and to the eastern side of the south. This
created a joint front and could be served as destinations for
key divisions and forced the US to arrange unwanted
deployments.
In fact, our armed forces
located in western Tri Thien, Truong Son-Central Highlands and
eastern part of the south regularly threatened the whole
southern battlefield. The people’s war initiative allowed the
Vietnamese forces to attack the enemy in both military and
political aspects.
The US and puppet troops had to
spread to face with our sudden attacks, therefore, their
strength in number, firepower and mobility was limited by our
encirclement. During the war, the US and puppet troops had
always been landed in the see-saw situation of between
occupation and mobility, dispersion and centralisation,
defence and assault and between “search and destroy” and
“pacification.”
Meanwhile, Vietnam’s forces
promoted the use of military and political activities and the
combination of guerilla and regular warfare.
The guerilla warfare in the
anti-US war reached the ever high level, becoming the local
people’s war which wore down significantly the enemy’s vital
force and war facilities and kept them in the strategic areas.
This forced them to disperse widely and created favourable
opportunities for our regular divisions to step up operation.
Vietnam’s military art focused
on the fighting method of key corps and large battles which
could change the situation in favour of our forces. After
defeating the US special war strategy through the campaigns in
Ba Gia, Binh Gia and Dong Xoai during the Spring-Autumn 1965
period, our main forces launched important operations against
Play Me, Khe Sanh, Road 9 in southern Laos, Quang Tri and
Northern Central Highlands. The three-prong strategic blows by
dividing the enemy’s forces and launching sudden attacks had
helped put a victorious end to the anti-US war for national
salvation.
In order to destroy the enemy’s
forces and defeat their invasion attempt, we selected the
strategy of attacking from different directions and through
both small and large scale campaigns. During the 1960
concerted uprising, our forces demolished the enemy’s local
administration in many rural areas, thus turning the
revolution in the south from preservation of our forces to the
assaulting position. In the Spring of 1968, we lured the enemy
deep into the Road 9-Khe Sanh battle and suddenly launched
attacks on a chain of urban areas in the south, smashing the
enemy’s ambition to control the situation. In the Spring of
1972, we used the main corps to destroy the enemy’s outer
defence line in Tri Thien, Tay Nguyen (Central Highlands) and
eastern region of the south. In the Spring of 1975, we
stretched the enemy and pinned them down in the two fronts in
Tri Thien and eastern south. Strong attacks were carried out
in Tay Nguyen, eliminating Army Corp 2 and Military Zone 2 of
the Saigon puppet troops and dividing their strategic front
and launching the 1975 offensive campaign. At the same time,
some forces were sent to liberate the islands controlled by
the puppet troops, restoring part of the country’s sacred
territories.
The military art in the anti-US
struggle was not only the art of selecting the attack
direction, but also the art of choosing targets and ways of
launching assaults.
In the people’s war, localities
created their own effective attacking methods which targeted
at the enemy’s weak and important targets such as bases, rear
locations, infrastructure and command posts located in the
urban areas of the south. Such assault method was based on the
enemy’s subjective attitude and our intelligence, courage and
creativity.
In the north, an air barrage
was set up with low, middle and high firing levels against the
enemy’s air raids. The combination of different forces was
successfully made to defeat the enemy’s attempt to escalate
the war.
The scale of campaigns and
weapons during the struggle against the US aggressors were
lifted to a new height which can be called as the military
art.
It is the military art which
used the strength of the whole people, combined military
operation with political and diplomatic activities, launched
different scales of attacks, made full use of forces and
opportunities, thus creating strength to defeat the enemy’s
strategic war. This helped defeat any of the enemy’s attempts
to expand the war and contributed to successfully liberating
the south, defending the north and reunifying the country.
This is a vivid evidence of
Vietnam’s abilities and mind in the new period.
By Colonel and Dr HO KHANG
(Vietnam Institute of Military
History) |